Tuesday 2 March 2010

The Yorkshire Ripper.

Etching by Francisco Goya.Image via Wikipedia

The Yorkshire ripper is a good example of why hanging should never have been abolished.
There was never any doubt, and never will be any doubt that this scum took the lives of thirteen women,and attempted to kill at least seven more, therefore it could have saved the taxpayers a lot money if he had hanged.
Now he is wasting more money, and taking up court time in his attempt to get a release date.

THIRTEEN LIFE SENTENCES AND HE IS BEING ALLOWED TO WASTE TIME AND MONEY THIS WAY!

With the abolition of hanging he should have got the next best thing, and been thrown in the corner of a cell, fed once a day with bread and water until he died. The public should have heard nothing about him, and he should have had no connection with the outside world.
Him and his kind should never be allowed to appeal against their conviction, never be released, and the only time the public should ever hear about them again is when they die in their prison cell.
The families of the ripper's victims must be furious that this scum is being allowed to rear his ugly head again.
Throw him back in his cell and leave him to rot, and any other of the vermin who have committed violent murders like him should never be heard of again, never given the chance to cause any more stress to their victims families.
WAKE UP YOU THICK HEADS THAT ALLOW THESE RIDICULOUS MOVES AND LET THE BASTARDS ROT.
Its time fitting punishments were adhered to.



Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

9 comments:

  1. I agree with you 100%. Unfortunately there are too many bleeding-heart-do-gooders out there who will start bleating about 'human rights' - true justice will never be done in this country.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great to hear someone else voice their opinion in ageement with mine, I think we should stand for parliament, then we might see some justice.
    I know if someone took that stance the public would support them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Couldn't agree with you more....what if it was a woman who was related to these "THICKHEADS" that had been murdered, I wonder if they would be so lenient and laid back about letting this "FIEND" loose....I VERY much doubt it !!

    ReplyDelete
  4. My sentiments entirely blue angel.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You are furious, aren't you? Ahem,..

    Well, I was not sure if I should reply or not... cause I have a different opinion.

    Human life is sacred.

    Plus, it has been proved, countless times, that our court systems are not perfect, that some people landed up in jail and death row, wrongly.
    What would happen if you hang an innocent man? How would you reverse that?

    And yeah, I am a human rights activist.

    Ps. I am not saying that the Yorkshire Ripper is an innocent, not at all.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well fab. bitch, although I admire your beliefs my opinion is still the same.It's people like the ripper who should be hung when there is no doubt whatsoever that he murdered these women, and it is time our court systems bucked up their ideas because with the responsibility they have, there is no room for error.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ready, Aim, Fire. All done.

    As long as there is honest and complete proof ... not an innocent, but the really guilty should be justly punished. They really, really asked for it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I come in peace! I have something for you on my blog!

    ReplyDelete
  9. That's what I am saying skdd, there are plenty who we know are guilty without a doubt, and it's them I am getting at.

    ReplyDelete